And here we go again....lol. What do you think of this article?
The competition between the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and the Subaru Impreza WRX STI has been going strong since the early 90s, and recently, we've been adding fuel to that fire. Here is the second side to the story, and obviously the truth...
Not so long ago, CT staff writer Darren Cassey wrote something that I, and many of you disagreed with. The article was called 9 Reasons Why The Subaru Impreza WRX STI Is Better Than The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, and as an Evo owner myself, I had to give my side of the story. Here are my arguments for why it?s the Evo that?s in fact the better car:
1. It's sharper to drive:
Sure, Subaru has been able to make a name for itself through Colin McRae, but he drove a heavily modified STI with all the best equipment and factory sponsorship. He probably had to replace the entire chassis and suspension to make it a frontrunner. The 2015 STI has a bit of improved steering and suspension over previous generations, but any reviews and first-hand experiences say the Evo still feels sharper and grounded while still being light.
If you buy a stock Evo, you can have the better handling without spending the extra money if you can?t afford it. It is well known that the chassis is more responsive in the Evo, and the S-AWC creates the best possible traction in all scenarios. In fact, you?ll feel more of the road, and it unknowingly makes the beginner driver improve more quickly. It?s confidence inspiring.
2. The noise is better:
If you?re looking for a car that always sounds like it?s trying to clear its throat, you?ve found the right one in purchasing a STI. The reason why everyone knows when the STI is coming is because they?re searching for the car that sounds like it is, in a raspy way, rapidly misfiring.
On the other hand, is the smoother, low grumble of the Evo. Even stock these cars give you the satisfaction that you?re driving a brilliantly quick car. If you?re looking for something that lets the neighbours know your Evo is home before they see you, there are loads of aftermarket exhausts that seal the deal without annoying the entire block; or having them look for the teenagers in a riced-out Civic.
3. It?s more understated:
You can?t tell me the STI is more understated. Look at the picture. Tell me that this is not a sleeper. Go ahead, I dare you.
4. Evos have a bonnet scoop too, and it's better:
Yes, the STI has a bonnet scoop. The Evo has a bonnet scoop, too (in fact, it has two more practical vents on the hood than the STI). And it?s more streamlined. As the driver you can even see across the hood to the other side of the car ? there isn?t anything there to block your view!
Plus, the Evo has functional fender vents that aid in cooling the brakes and venting air normally trapped in the wheel well, and, of course, add to the rally looks of the car.
5. Evo owners aren't snobs:
This probably depends upon the country, but certainly in the US it feels as though many STI owners around do not understand that the competition between the STI and the Evo is what makes the cars succeed; they tend to be snobby and stick to their own car club. The competitiveness, though, is what has driven the manufacturers to build the best cars possible, and what has pushed them to the top for all of these years. Owners of both brands should be, even considering brand loyalty, praising each other?s work. The Evo culture here is doing exactly that.
And, although it may surprise you, the majority of STI owners I have spoken with at car meets and competitions admit they wish they had an Evo. The Evo is STI-owner approved.
6. Who cares that the Impreza has its own colour scheme?
I will admit I grew up wanting the exact iconic colour scheme of gold rims on Subaru Blue. It is iconic ? I?ll give them that. Subaru has done a great job branding using that paint arrangement. However, don?t just throw the Evo out because they don?t have an explicit colour scheme. They?ve branded themselves with their overall looks; they are not hiding behind specific colours.
The body kit on the Evo X SSS package has it all ? it?s sporty, sexy, and sleek. The front lip not only is a functional aid in aerodynamics, it gives the stock Evo the lowered aggressive look. The side skirts add width and make the body flow from front to back, and the spoiler is just big enough without being over-the-top (ahem2015 STI ahem). The newest STI just looks like an Evo and a Civic SI made a baby.
Let us not forget about those Recaro racing seats that come with the stock Evo. Oy vey those are comfortable and snug for tight, fast cornering ? even for a woman?s hips! I?ve done multiple 2500-mile road trips in those seats; I know they?re comfortable. But let?s face it, why are you buying this type of car if you aren?t going to drive hard? You don?t want the no-name plush seats with somewhat functionality, you want the racing seats.
7. No limited edition Evos = a good thing:
Yes, Subaru has done well by offering Limited Edition and special occasion STIs. But who has that money to throw down for one of those? And if you can buy one, you?re going to be too afraid to drive it hard for fear of it losing value! What?s a rally car without the rally?
Or, buy the Evo. No limited edition. No special authenticated plaque. If you care about a special colour scheme, have it custom done. Then take all of that extra money you didn?t spend on the Limited Edition Subaru and throw it into modding the crap out of your already awesome Evo. Then it truly is a special edition.
8. It still looks awesome in hatchback form:
Just in case you haven?t stepped outside your Subaru bubble recently, Mitsubishi also has a hatchback. It might not be as aesthetically pleasing, but when it boils down to it, is Subaru making the hatchback anymore? Nope. Besides, a hatchback is for practicality. It?s said that the STI is a more practical, friendlier daily driver. That may be so, but I have two points here that may make you look twice at the Evo instead.
1) My Evo is a daily driver. It?s comfortable for long treks (see my bit about the seats prior) yet track ready when I need it to be.
2) I can fit a rear-facing car seat and a stroller in my car (yes, in the ?small? trunk without removing the sound system). What is more practical than a family car? If you need to haul something bigger than what can fit in the car, buy a truck.
9. The STI has outlived the Evo:
We all heard the news that Mitsubishi has discontinued the Evo X. Yes that means the STI is the last one standing, but is it the best one left? Or just left? From the very beginning Mitsubishi and Subaru were battling, producing the Lancer Evolution versus the WRX STI-specific rivalry in 1993. Ever since their induction the STIs have been playing catch-up to the Evo, it?s not a secret.
Subaru producing the STI with no direct competitor is only going to increase the price of your STI while limiting the pressure on Subaru to produce a better car. I mean, c?mon, Mitsubishi didn?t stop producing the Evo because it was losing to Subaru and the STI.
This article was written by freelance writer Kate Sickelka.
The competition between the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and the Subaru Impreza WRX STI has been going strong since the early 90s, and recently, we've been adding fuel to that fire. Here is the second side to the story, and obviously the truth...
Not so long ago, CT staff writer Darren Cassey wrote something that I, and many of you disagreed with. The article was called 9 Reasons Why The Subaru Impreza WRX STI Is Better Than The Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, and as an Evo owner myself, I had to give my side of the story. Here are my arguments for why it?s the Evo that?s in fact the better car:
1. It's sharper to drive:
Sure, Subaru has been able to make a name for itself through Colin McRae, but he drove a heavily modified STI with all the best equipment and factory sponsorship. He probably had to replace the entire chassis and suspension to make it a frontrunner. The 2015 STI has a bit of improved steering and suspension over previous generations, but any reviews and first-hand experiences say the Evo still feels sharper and grounded while still being light.
If you buy a stock Evo, you can have the better handling without spending the extra money if you can?t afford it. It is well known that the chassis is more responsive in the Evo, and the S-AWC creates the best possible traction in all scenarios. In fact, you?ll feel more of the road, and it unknowingly makes the beginner driver improve more quickly. It?s confidence inspiring.
2. The noise is better:
If you?re looking for a car that always sounds like it?s trying to clear its throat, you?ve found the right one in purchasing a STI. The reason why everyone knows when the STI is coming is because they?re searching for the car that sounds like it is, in a raspy way, rapidly misfiring.
On the other hand, is the smoother, low grumble of the Evo. Even stock these cars give you the satisfaction that you?re driving a brilliantly quick car. If you?re looking for something that lets the neighbours know your Evo is home before they see you, there are loads of aftermarket exhausts that seal the deal without annoying the entire block; or having them look for the teenagers in a riced-out Civic.
3. It?s more understated:
You can?t tell me the STI is more understated. Look at the picture. Tell me that this is not a sleeper. Go ahead, I dare you.
4. Evos have a bonnet scoop too, and it's better:
Yes, the STI has a bonnet scoop. The Evo has a bonnet scoop, too (in fact, it has two more practical vents on the hood than the STI). And it?s more streamlined. As the driver you can even see across the hood to the other side of the car ? there isn?t anything there to block your view!
Plus, the Evo has functional fender vents that aid in cooling the brakes and venting air normally trapped in the wheel well, and, of course, add to the rally looks of the car.
5. Evo owners aren't snobs:
This probably depends upon the country, but certainly in the US it feels as though many STI owners around do not understand that the competition between the STI and the Evo is what makes the cars succeed; they tend to be snobby and stick to their own car club. The competitiveness, though, is what has driven the manufacturers to build the best cars possible, and what has pushed them to the top for all of these years. Owners of both brands should be, even considering brand loyalty, praising each other?s work. The Evo culture here is doing exactly that.
And, although it may surprise you, the majority of STI owners I have spoken with at car meets and competitions admit they wish they had an Evo. The Evo is STI-owner approved.
6. Who cares that the Impreza has its own colour scheme?
I will admit I grew up wanting the exact iconic colour scheme of gold rims on Subaru Blue. It is iconic ? I?ll give them that. Subaru has done a great job branding using that paint arrangement. However, don?t just throw the Evo out because they don?t have an explicit colour scheme. They?ve branded themselves with their overall looks; they are not hiding behind specific colours.
The body kit on the Evo X SSS package has it all ? it?s sporty, sexy, and sleek. The front lip not only is a functional aid in aerodynamics, it gives the stock Evo the lowered aggressive look. The side skirts add width and make the body flow from front to back, and the spoiler is just big enough without being over-the-top (ahem2015 STI ahem). The newest STI just looks like an Evo and a Civic SI made a baby.
Let us not forget about those Recaro racing seats that come with the stock Evo. Oy vey those are comfortable and snug for tight, fast cornering ? even for a woman?s hips! I?ve done multiple 2500-mile road trips in those seats; I know they?re comfortable. But let?s face it, why are you buying this type of car if you aren?t going to drive hard? You don?t want the no-name plush seats with somewhat functionality, you want the racing seats.
7. No limited edition Evos = a good thing:
Yes, Subaru has done well by offering Limited Edition and special occasion STIs. But who has that money to throw down for one of those? And if you can buy one, you?re going to be too afraid to drive it hard for fear of it losing value! What?s a rally car without the rally?
Or, buy the Evo. No limited edition. No special authenticated plaque. If you care about a special colour scheme, have it custom done. Then take all of that extra money you didn?t spend on the Limited Edition Subaru and throw it into modding the crap out of your already awesome Evo. Then it truly is a special edition.
8. It still looks awesome in hatchback form:
Just in case you haven?t stepped outside your Subaru bubble recently, Mitsubishi also has a hatchback. It might not be as aesthetically pleasing, but when it boils down to it, is Subaru making the hatchback anymore? Nope. Besides, a hatchback is for practicality. It?s said that the STI is a more practical, friendlier daily driver. That may be so, but I have two points here that may make you look twice at the Evo instead.
1) My Evo is a daily driver. It?s comfortable for long treks (see my bit about the seats prior) yet track ready when I need it to be.
2) I can fit a rear-facing car seat and a stroller in my car (yes, in the ?small? trunk without removing the sound system). What is more practical than a family car? If you need to haul something bigger than what can fit in the car, buy a truck.
9. The STI has outlived the Evo:
We all heard the news that Mitsubishi has discontinued the Evo X. Yes that means the STI is the last one standing, but is it the best one left? Or just left? From the very beginning Mitsubishi and Subaru were battling, producing the Lancer Evolution versus the WRX STI-specific rivalry in 1993. Ever since their induction the STIs have been playing catch-up to the Evo, it?s not a secret.
Subaru producing the STI with no direct competitor is only going to increase the price of your STI while limiting the pressure on Subaru to produce a better car. I mean, c?mon, Mitsubishi didn?t stop producing the Evo because it was losing to Subaru and the STI.
This article was written by freelance writer Kate Sickelka.
